Complex urban processes in the Indus civilisation
Mesopotamia and the Indus civilisation were both urban civilisations with large, densely populated and planned cities, 6000-1990 BCE. A new thesis in archaeology points out that the ancient Indus society showed complex patterns of urbanity that were rare in other ancient societies.
The aim of the thesis was to analyse the main differences in the settlements of the Indus civilisation’s settlements and their urban infrastructure, some 4000-5000 years ago. The study included an investigation of the urbanisation process in relation to the size of the population, the settlement area, and the geographical location of the urban centres.
“The aim was to analyse the urban infrastructure of the Indus civilisation by comparing archaeological data from its largest urban formations. The effects of urbanisation on the regional environment have also been treated in the thesis,” says Sidra Gulzar, doctoral student in archaeology at the University of Gothenburg.
The study also compares the urban process and development from the Indus region with the Mesopotamian region on a number of levels. This was done using available archaeological material, focusing on a limited number of artefacts from Mohenjo Daro, Harappa and Ganweriwala, which were analysed and compared using the SEM-EDX method (Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-Ray Analysis).
“The results from the SEM-EDX analysis showed that the artefacts were produced locally.”
The least investigated settlement
Sidra Gulzar focused particularly on Ganweriwala since it is the least investigated settlement in the Indus region to date.
“The biggest problem in understanding the development of urban infrastructure in the Indus society is the knowledge gap surrounding the settlement of Ganweriwala.”
The results of the surface and artefact study from Ganweriwala indicate that the site was a major urban centre during the Indus cities period of 2600-1900 BCE. The site shares similar cultural expressions with other large urban centres such as its settlement plan, types of artefacts, writing on clay tablets and certain types of figurines.
“Using data from Ganweriwala as a case study, my thesis is that Indus urban infrastructure is a complex phenomenon with greater similarities and fewer differences. There were five major urban centres on different urban and socio-economic scales,” says Sidra Gulzar.
The study contributes to a deeper theoretical and empirical understanding of the settlement of Ganweriwala in relation to its surrounding environment, which has never before been investigated or reported.
Similarities and differences
The thesis also compares settlements in the Diyala region of Mesopotamia with the Cholistan region in the Indus civilisation in order to trace similarities and differences in their respective urban processes and the impact of those processes on the environment.
“Comparing the data from the different settlements shows that the settlements in the Cholistan were more densely populated than in the Diyala region. The urban settlements in Cholistan were totally abandoned around 1900 BCe, while in the Diyala region there was continuity in the settlement around 1900 BCE,” says Sidra Gulzar.
The Indus civilisation had a greater expansion than that of Mesopotamia, but also a limited number of larger urban centres. The large urban settlements from both of these civilisations showed variability – different types of settlement plans, the cities were constructed with different building materials, and the surrounding (natural) environment differed.
Photo: The Ganweriwala settlement is located in the desert and was discovered around 40 years ago but because of logistics and several other problems only few archaeologists visited it. This thesis is the first systematic study about its size, topography, artefacts and its environment.
Contact details: Sidra Gulzar, phone: +46765-945170, e-mail: email@example.com
The thesis Settlement Scaling and Urban Infrastructure. A Comparative Approach to Settlements from the Ancient Indus Society was defended publicly on 11 February at the University of Gothenburg.