When smartphones remind you to learn

Do smartphone reminders encourage pupils to engage regularly with learning material? Researchers at the DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education investigated this question. Their conclusion: simple reminders such as push notifications tend to have a negative effect on learning times. It is true that pupils learn more often on days when they are reminded than on days without reminders. Overall, however, a control group that was never reminded studied on more days. The study was presented in the journal “Science of Learning” and is freely available.

“Smartphone reminders are very practical - they help us to drink more water during the day, remember birthdays and not miss any other appointments,” explains Lea Nobbe, first author of the recently published article. When it comes to learning, however, they are a double-edged sword: “The positive effect on learning behavior is rather short-term. In the longer term, pupils hand over responsibility for learning to the smartphone, with the risk that they will only rely on it.”

85 children between the ages of ten and twelve took part in the study. The researchers divided them into two groups and tracked their learning behavior over 36 days using the usage data of a vocabulary learning app. The reminder group was reminded of learning up to 16 times at irregular intervals, while the comparison group received no such reminders. The researchers then evaluated how likely it is that pupils learn on days with and days without reminders.

This showed that the comparison group, which did not receive reminders, studied the vocabulary on 26 of the 36 days on average. In contrast, students in the reminder group only used the app on 22 days. On days when their smartphone reminded them to study, the average probability of practicing was 69 percent, whereas on days without reminders it was only 60 percent. However, especially towards the end of the observation period, the students often only studied on the days on which they received a reminder. In the control group, learning behavior also decreased after some time, but not as much as in the reminder group. In vocabulary tests, on the other hand, the students in both groups performed almost equally.

These results complement the findings from an earlier study by the same working group. According to this, special learning planning apps can certainly help to organize everyday life and learning. According to DIPF researcher Nobbe, it makes a difference whether it is a simple reminder, such as a push message, or whether the students develop individual learning plans or self-commitments for themselves in a suitable app and reinforce them with reminders. “Overall, learning should be a habit and not be determined by reminders,” says the psychologist. “The aim should be for students to develop the ability to find and apply learning strategies that suit them. Reminders can play a role in this, but should actually become superfluous over time because the learning process takes on a life of its own.”

About DIPF:

The DIPF is the Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education with locations in Frankfurt am Main and in Berlin. It wants to contribute to meeting challenges in education and for researching education. To this end, the institute supports schools, daycare centers, universities, science, administration and politics with research, digital infrastructure and knowledge transfer. The overarching goal of its activities is a high quality education that is responsible, promotes equity, is internationally compatible, and can also be researched in the best possible way. http://www.dipf.de/en

Press contact:

Anke Wilde, +49 (0)69 24708-824, a.wilde@dipf.de, pr@dipf.de

Wissenschaftlicher Ansprechpartner:
Lea Nobbe, +49 (0)69 24708-518, l.nobbe@dipf.de

Originalpublikation:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41539-024-00253-7